Bakra v. Trent
This text of 667 F. App'x 41 (Bakra v. Trent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[42]*42Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Al-Qahira Jihad Al-Mateen B’akra appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bakra v. Trent, No. 7:16-cv-00009-JLK-RSB, 2016 WL 397904 (W.D. Va. Jan. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 F. App'x 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bakra-v-trent-ca4-2016.