Bakra v. Trent

Fourth Circuit

Bakra v. Trent

667 F. App'x 41

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2016·No. No. 16-6191·Published

Opinion

[42] Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Al-Qahira Jihad Al-Mateen B’akra appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bakra v. Trent, No. 7:16-cv-00009-JLK-RSB, 2016 WL 397904 (W.D. Va. Jan. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[42] Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Al-Qahira Jihad Al-Mateen B’akra appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bakra v. Trent, No. 7:16-cv-00009-JLK-RSB, 2016 WL 397904 (W.D. Va. Jan. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Bakra v. Trent, 667 F. App'x 41 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 41 (Bakra v. Trent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related