Bakos v. Insura Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.

1998 Ohio 537, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1219
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 29, 1998·No. 1997-2431·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 1219.]

BAKOS, APPELLEE, v. INSURA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS.

[Cite as Bakos v. Insura Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 1998-Ohio-537.] Certification of conflict dismissed for want of conflict within meaning of S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(B). (No. 97-2431—Submitted October 28, 1998—Decided December 30, 1998.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 71949. __________________ Peterson & Zelasko and Bradford D. Zelasko, for appellee. McNeal, Schick, Archibald & Biro Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Ziegler, for appellant Insura Property & Casualty Insurance Company. Weston Hurd Fallon Paisley & Howley L.L.P., John G. Farnan, Hilary S. Taylor and William H. Baughman, Jr., for appellant St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed for want of conflict within the meaning of S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(B). MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER AND LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., CONCUR. COOK, J., dissents. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent from the decision to dismiss this case as improvidently certified and, if addressing this case on the merits, would affirm the decision of the court of appeals. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bakos v. Insura Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 1998 Ohio 537, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1219 (Ohio 1998).

1998 Ohio 537 (Bakos v. Insura Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bakos v. Insura Property & Casualty Insurance
1998 Ohio 537 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)