Bakke v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
This text of 19 F. App'x 657 (Bakke v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Bronwen Bakke appeals the district court’s decision, after a bench trial, that an incident aboard the MTV Viking Serenade was not a substantial factor in causing the entrapment of and injury to the ulnar nerve of her right arm. See Ribitzki v. Canmar Reading & Bates, Ltd. P’ship, 111 F.3d 658, 665 (9th Cir.1997); Lies v. Farrell Lines, Inc., 641 F.2d 765, 769 (9th Cir.1981). There was evidence on both sides of the issue, and the district court resolved the conflict against Bakke. On this record, we cannot say that the court’s factual determinations were clearly erroneous. See Evanow v. M/V Neptune, 163 F.3d 1108, 1113 (9th Cir.1998).
AFFIRMED.
■pjjjg disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 F. App'x 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bakke-v-royal-caribbean-cruises-ltd-ca9-2001.