Baker's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Baker's Appeal

3 A. 766, 2 Sadler 162, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 594

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 5, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 A. 766 (Baker's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker's Appeal, 3 A. 766, 2 Sadler 162, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 594 (Pa. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It was the duty of the garnishee to make full, direct, and true answers to the interrogatories put him. The attempt of the appellant is to now prove a state of facts clearly in conflict with the answers he had made under oath, to the interrogatories. The second, fifth, and seventh were amply sufficient to require him to disclose the purchase which he now sets up. Having failed to do so and averred the contrary, he is estopped by those answers.

Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

It was the duty of the garnishee to make full, direct, and true answers to the interrogatories put him. The attempt of the appellant is to now prove a state of facts clearly in conflict with the answers he had made under oath, to the interrogatories. The second, fifth, and seventh were amply sufficient to require him to disclose the purchase which he now sets up. Having failed to do so and averred the contrary, he is estopped by those answers.

Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A. 766, 2 Sadler 162, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bakers-appeal-pa-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack