Bakerman v. Department Of Business Regulation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bakerman v. Department Of Business Regulation

649 So. 2d 275, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 97, 1995 WL 7695

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 11, 1995·No. No. 93-1142·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Bakerman appeals an order of the Department of Business Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering.

Assuming, without deciding, that appellant was entitled to an administrative appeal as a matter of right to the Division of Pari-Mutu-el Wagering, we find no reversible evidentia-ry error and conclude that the law was correctly applied. See Fla.Admin.Code R. 61D-1.008(16); Hyman v. State, Dep’t of Business Regulation, Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 431 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); § 550.2415, Fla.Stat. (1993).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert Bakerman appeals an order of the Department of Business Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering.

Assuming, without deciding, that appellant was entitled to an administrative appeal as a matter of right to the Division of Pari-Mutu-el Wagering, we find no reversible evidentia-ry error and conclude that the law was correctly applied. See Fla.Admin.Code R. 61D-1.008(16); Hyman v. State, Dep’t of Business Regulation, Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 431 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); § 550.2415, Fla.Stat. (1993).

Affirmed.

Bakerman v. Department Of Business Regulation, 649 So. 2d 275, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 97, 1995 WL 7695 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

649 So. 2d 275 (Bakerman v. Department Of Business Regulation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related