Bakerman v. Department Of Business Regulation
This text of 649 So. 2d 275 (Bakerman v. Department Of Business Regulation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Bakerman appeals an order of the Department of Business Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering.
Assuming, without deciding, that appellant was entitled to an administrative appeal as a matter of right to the Division of Pari-Mutu-el Wagering, we find no reversible evidentia-ry error and conclude that the law was correctly applied. See Fla.Admin.Code R. 61D-1.008(16); Hyman v. State, Dep’t of Business Regulation, Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 431 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); § 550.2415, Fla.Stat. (1993).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
649 So. 2d 275, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 97, 1995 WL 7695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bakerman-v-department-of-business-regulation-fladistctapp-1995.