Bakerman v. Atlantic National Bank of Florida
This text of 506 So. 2d 487 (Bakerman v. Atlantic National Bank of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Reversed. We believe the trial court erred in failing to grant appellant’s motion for relief from judgment. In our view appellant properly established that his guaranty only applied to the first ten percent of the principal amount of the loan in question, and it is undisputed that the ap-pellee bank collected an amount in excess of that guaranty from other sources, thereby rendering appellant’s guaranty moot. Cf Woodruff v. Exchange National Bank of Tampa, 392 So.2d 285 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). In addition, it is undisputed on this record that appellee bank unconditionally released appellant’s co-guarantors, thereby releasing appellant by operation of law. See Movielab, Inc. v. Davis, 217 So.2d 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
506 So. 2d 487, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1175, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bakerman-v-atlantic-national-bank-of-florida-fladistctapp-1987.