Baker v. Woolard

Fourth Circuit

Baker v. Woolard

473 F. App'x 335

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 30, 2012

DocketNo. 12-1376

StatusPublished

This text of 473 F. App'x 335 (Baker v. Woolard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Woolard, 473 F. App'x 335 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tania Baker appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Baker v. Woolard, No. 1:11-cv-02484-CCB (D.Md. Mar. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Tania Baker appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Baker v. Woolard, No. 1:11-cv-02484-CCB (D.Md. Mar. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 F. App'x 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-woolard-ca4-2012.