Baker v. Verret

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Baker v. Verret

899 So. 2d 654, 4 La.App. 3 Cir. 1484, 2005 La. App. LEXIS 674, 2005 WL 665233

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 23, 2005·No. No. 04-1484·Published

Opinions

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Glod v. Baker, 04-1483 (La. App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), 899 So.2d 642, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of the appeal are assessed to appellants, BCM, L.L.C. and Nawlins Kajun Foods, L.L.C.

AFFIRMED.

PETERS, J., Dissents and Assigns Written Reasons.

AMY, J., Concurs for the Reasons Assigned in Glod v. Baker, 04-1483 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), 899 So.2d 642.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Glod v. Baker, 04-1483 (La. App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), 899 So.2d 642, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of the appeal are assessed to appellants, BCM, L.L.C. and Nawlins Kajun Foods, L.L.C.

AFFIRMED.

PETERS, J., Dissents and Assigns Written Reasons.

AMY, J., Concurs for the Reasons Assigned in Glod v. Baker, 04-1483 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), 899 So.2d 642.

Baker v. Verret, 899 So. 2d 654, 4 La.App. 3 Cir. 1484, 2005 La. App. LEXIS 674, 2005 WL 665233 (La. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

899 So. 2d 654 (Baker v. Verret) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related