Baker v. United States

Court of Claims

Baker v. United States

75 Ct. Cl. 471, 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 364, 1932 WL 2209

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedJune 6, 1932

DocketNo. L-108

StatusPublished

This text of 75 Ct. Cl. 471 (Baker v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. United States, 75 Ct. Cl. 471, 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 364, 1932 WL 2209 (cc 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

LittletoN, Judge,

delivered the opinion.

The issue presented in this case involves a question of fact and is whether plaintiff’s mother was dependent upon him for her chief support within the meaning of section 4 of the act of June 10, 1922. The facts disclose that she was dependent. Plaintiff regularly contributed $75 a month for her support and she received no other contributions from any source. Her total receipts from all other sources until' October, 1929, did not exceed $15.33 a month at any timé, and they did not exceed $23.33 a month at any time thereafter. In these circumstances it is our opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the increased allowances authorized by the statute.

[475]*475July 31, 1930, was the last date on which proof showing chief dependency was taken. Leave is granted to the plaintiff to submit further proof showing, if such be the fact, dependency subsequent to that date.

Judgment will be entered in favor of the plaintiff upon the filing of a statement from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due.

Whaley, Judge; Williams, Judge; Green, Judge; and Booth, Chief Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LittletoN, Judge,

delivered the opinion.

The issue presented in this case involves a question of fact and is whether plaintiff’s mother was dependent upon him for her chief support within the meaning of section 4 of the act of June 10, 1922. The facts disclose that she was dependent. Plaintiff regularly contributed $75 a month for her support and she received no other contributions from any source. Her total receipts from all other sources until' October, 1929, did not exceed $15.33 a month at any timé, and they did not exceed $23.33 a month at any time thereafter. In these circumstances it is our opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the increased allowances authorized by the statute.

[475]*475July 31, 1930, was the last date on which proof showing chief dependency was taken. Leave is granted to the plaintiff to submit further proof showing, if such be the fact, dependency subsequent to that date.

Judgment will be entered in favor of the plaintiff upon the filing of a statement from the General Accounting Office showing the amount due.

Whaley, Judge; Williams, Judge; Green, Judge; and Booth, Chief Justice, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 Ct. Cl. 471, 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 364, 1932 WL 2209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-united-states-cc-1932.