Baker v. TRUSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
715 N.W.2d 821, 475 Mich. 883
This text of 715 N.W.2d 821 (Baker v. TRUSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baker v. TRUSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 715 N.W.2d 821, 475 Mich. 883 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Craig Allen BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TRUSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., d/b/a West Michigan Truss; Grace Reformed Church of Holland Township; and Steven Wayne Boersema, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
715 N.W.2d 821, 475 Mich. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-truss-technologies-inc-mich-2006.