Baker v. Taylor

1 Cow. 165
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1823·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Curia.

The discharge was too late to admit of its being pleaded puis darrein continuance. This could no more be done than if judgment had been signed. In the latter case the uniform practice is to discharge upon motion. The case of Baker v. Judges of Ulster, in the 4th John. Rep. 191, is substantially this case. Here is nothing alleged against the discharge. Should the plaintiff object fraud, or other ground impeaching its validity, we might then open the cause, so far as to give him a chance to try this question, leaving the judgment, in the mean time, to stand as security.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. Taylor, 1 Cow. 165 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

1 Cow. 165 (Baker v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Humphreys
14 A. 583 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1888)
West Philadelphia Bank v. . Gerry
13 N.E. 453 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)
Bamberg v. Stern
1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 342 (New York Marine Court, 1877)
Monroe v. . Upton
50 N.Y. 593 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)
Ewing v. Peck
17 Ala. 339 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1850)