Baker v. State

69 S.W.2d 1117, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 961
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 Tex. Crim. 209
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 28, 1934·No. No. 16574·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the violation of the law forbidding the practice of medicine without compliance With the statutory requirements prescribed by the Legislature in title 12, chapter 6, P. C. 1925; penalty assessed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for one day.

There is before us no statement of the facts heard in the trial court. Apparently the trial was had before the judge without a jury.

We find nothing in the motion for new trial which would warrant this court in interfering with the verdict.

The state of the record precludes any disposition of the case except to order an af-firmance, which is accordingly done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 69 S.W.2d 1117, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 961 (Tex. 1934).

69 S.W.2d 1117 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.