Baker v. State
This text of Baker v. State (Baker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT
BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2),
SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Henry Baker, Appellant,
v.
State of South Carolina, Respondent.
Appeal From York County
Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-448
Submitted July 7, 2004 Filed August
25, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Tara S. Taggart, Assistant Appellate Defender, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Attorney General David A. Spencer, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Henry Baker appeals the circuit courts dismissal of his Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Any matter cognizable under the Uniform Post-Conviction Procedure Act may not be raised by a writ of habeas corpus in circuit court. Simpson v. State, 329 S.C. 43, 46, 495 S.E.2d 429, 431 (1998). After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Bakers appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Baker v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-state-scctapp-2004.