Baker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Baker v. State

1923 OK CR 103, 214 P. 735, 23 Okla. Crim. 308, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 186

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 2, 1923

DocketNo. A-4320.

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK CR 103 (Baker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. State, 1923 OK CR 103, 214 P. 735, 23 Okla. Crim. 308, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 186 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error, Charles Baker, was informed against for the murder of one Thurman Hines, alleged to have been committed in 'Hughes county on or about the 28th day of July, 1921, by shooting with a pistol. The trial jury found him guilty of manslaughter in the first degree and fixed his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of 22 years. From the judgment rendered in accordance with the verdict on the 9th day of December, 1921, an appeal was duly perfected' by filing in this court on April *309 26, 1922, a petition in error with case-made.

Counsel of record for plaintiff in error have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Where an appeal is perfected from a judgment of conviction and plaintiff in error before final submission moves that the appeal be dismissed, its dismissal will be ordered.

It is therefore adjudged and ordered that the appeal in the above entitled and numbered cause be dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause its judgment and sentence to be carried into execution. Mandate forthwith.

MATSON, P. J., and BESSEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error, Charles Baker, was informed against for the murder of one Thurman Hines, alleged to have been committed in 'Hughes county on or about the 28th day of July, 1921, by shooting with a pistol. The trial jury found him guilty of manslaughter in the first degree and fixed his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of 22 years. From the judgment rendered in accordance with the verdict on the 9th day of December, 1921, an appeal was duly perfected' by filing in this court on April *309 26, 1922, a petition in error with case-made.

Counsel of record for plaintiff in error have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Where an appeal is perfected from a judgment of conviction and plaintiff in error before final submission moves that the appeal be dismissed, its dismissal will be ordered.

It is therefore adjudged and ordered that the appeal in the above entitled and numbered cause be dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause its judgment and sentence to be carried into execution. Mandate forthwith.

MATSON, P. J., and BESSEY, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK CR 103, 214 P. 735, 23 Okla. Crim. 308, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-state-oklacrimapp-1923.