Baker v. State
36 A.D.2d 881, 320 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4184
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 27, 1971·No. Claim Nos. 48589, 50077·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Reynolds, J. P., Staley, Jr., and Sweeney, JJ., concur; Greenblott, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial, in the following memorandum, in which Cooke, J., concurs: I vote for reversal and a new trial, agreeing with the majority that the award for direct damages cannot stand. However, in my opinion there should be a new trial on this issue. It is harsh to deprive this claimant, whose property was taken against his will, of an opportunity to present an appraisal which would meet the proper standards.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baker v. State, 36 A.D.2d 881, 320 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).
36 A.D.2d 881 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Donaloio v. State
99 A.D.2d 335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Cummings v. State
62 A.D.2d 1084 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)