Baker v. State
397 S.W.3d 36, 2013 WL 1604520, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 452
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1805 →
Opinion
[37]*37 ORDER
Cedric Baker (Movant) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and-find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baker v. State, 397 S.W.3d 36, 2013 WL 1604520, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 452 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
397 S.W.3d 36 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.