Baker v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Baker v. State

166 S.E. 447, 46 Ga. App. 44, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 27

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 16, 1932

Docket22698

StatusPublished

This text of 166 S.E. 447 (Baker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. State, 166 S.E. 447, 46 Ga. App. 44, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 27 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence was ample to support the verdict of guilty. The two special grounds of the motion for a new trial were based on alleged newly discovered evidence. One ground was cumulative of evidence adduced on the trial, and the other ground was impeaching in its nature, and the motion for a new trial was, therefore, properly overruled by the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Hooper, J., concur. MacIntyre, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence was ample to support the verdict of guilty. The two special grounds of the motion for a new trial were based on alleged newly discovered evidence. One ground was cumulative of evidence adduced on the trial, and the other ground was impeaching in its nature, and the motion for a new trial was, therefore, properly overruled by the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Hooper, J., concur. MacIntyre, J., not presiding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 S.E. 447, 46 Ga. App. 44, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-state-gactapp-1932.