Baker v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Baker v. State

149 S.E. 103, 40 Ga. App. 162, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 66

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 9, 1929

Docket19777

StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.E. 103 (Baker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. State, 149 S.E. 103, 40 Ga. App. 162, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 66 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

Tlie petition for certiorari points out no reason why another trial is required. The evidence sustains the verdict, and no error was committed when the certiorari was overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. George G. Finch, J esse B. Simmons, for plaintiff in error. John B. McClelland, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

Tlie petition for certiorari points out no reason why another trial is required. The evidence sustains the verdict, and no error was committed when the certiorari was overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. George G. Finch, J esse B. Simmons, for plaintiff in error. John B. McClelland, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 S.E. 103, 40 Ga. App. 162, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-state-gactapp-1929.