Baker v. State

23 S.E. 829, 97 Ga. 347
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 21, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 23 S.E. 829 (Baker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. State, 23 S.E. 829, 97 Ga. 347 (Ga. 1895).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The indictment contained all the allegations essential to charge the offense of perjury, and the demurrer to the same was properly overruled. Judgment affirmed.

N. A. Morris and P. D. McOleskey, for plaintiff in error. George R. Brown, solicitor-general, and Thomas Hutcherson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Darnell v. State
11 S.E.2d 692 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Lancaster v. State
187 S.E. 903 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Pope v. State
158 S.E. 350 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Sikes v. State
31 S.E. 567 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 S.E. 829, 97 Ga. 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-state-ga-1895.