Baker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Baker v. State

255 So. 3d 879

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 26, 2018

DocketCase No. 2D16–1058

StatusPublished

This text of 255 So. 3d 879 (Baker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. State, 255 So. 3d 879 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without comment the order revoking Mr. Baker's probation. However, because the order of revocation erroneously indicates that Mr. Baker pleaded guilty to violating his probation when in fact he was found in violation after an evidentiary hearing, we remand this case for the trial court to correct the scrivener's error. See Turner v. State, 873 So.2d 480, 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener's error.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without comment the order revoking Mr. Baker's probation. However, because the order of revocation erroneously indicates that Mr. Baker pleaded guilty to violating his probation when in fact he was found in violation after an evidentiary hearing, we remand this case for the trial court to correct the scrivener's error. See Turner v. State, 873 So.2d 480, 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener's error.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 So. 3d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack