Baker v. State

119 So. 3d 532, 2013 WL 4223967, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12807
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1436
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 16, 2013·No. No. 5D12-4282·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm that part of the order under review holding that Appellant, Markeise Deandre Baker, violated his probation. We also affirm the sentence imposed. However, because Defendant was originally sentenced as a youthful offender, the trial court erred in removing the youthful offender status at sentencing. See Christian v. State, 84 So.3d 437 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). We note that the State properly concedes this error. Accordingly, we remand this case to the trial court to enter a corrected order reinstating Defendant’s youthful offender designation.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of a corrected order.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 119 So. 3d 532, 2013 WL 4223967, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12807 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

119 So. 3d 532 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Christian v. State
84 So. 3d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)