Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Baker v. State

Baker v. State

904 So. 2d 505, 2005 WL 1163400
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 2005·No. 4D05-1445·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

904 So.2d 505 (2005)

Edward E. BAKER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D05-1445.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 18, 2005.
Rehearing Denied July 15, 2005.

Edward E. Baker, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of the defendant's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) finding that his claim of vindictive sentencing cannot be raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence. Benedetto v. State, 895 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), citing Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

KLEIN, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 904 So. 2d 505, 2005 WL 1163400 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

904 So. 2d 505 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Belser v. State
229 So. 3d 875 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
JEREMY BELSER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017
Pryor v. State
924 So. 2d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Thomas v. State
914 So. 2d 27 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)