Baker v. State

561 So. 2d 1366, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4322, 1990 WL 80816
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 526 So. 2d 202
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 13, 1990·No. No. 90-01476·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Baker timely appeals the summary denial of his motion for jail credit. In his motion, Baker alleges that he was entitled to credit for time spent incarcerated from July 6, 1989 until his sentencing on August 25, 1989. Although the trial judge denied the motion, he did not attach to his order any portion of the files or records to refute Baker’s allegations.

Accordingly, we reverse the order denying the motion and remand the case to the trial court for attachments from the records or files refuting Baker’s allegation. If the court should again deny Baker’s motion, he has thirty days in which to appeal.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 561 So. 2d 1366, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4322, 1990 WL 80816 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

561 So. 2d 1366 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.