Baker v. State

863 So. 2d 293, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 825, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1990, 2003 WL 22669382
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 13, 2003·No. No. SC01-2315·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We granted review of Baker v. State, 793 So.2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), based upon the district court’s certification of conflict with the opinion in Lester v. State, 737 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. However, after further consideration, we decline to exercise our discretion to review this mat[294]*294ter. Accordingly, the petition for review is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, C.J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 863 So. 2d 293, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 825, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1990, 2003 WL 22669382 (Fla. 2003).

863 So. 2d 293 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
793 So. 2d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Lester v. State
737 So. 2d 1149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)