Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Baker v. State

Baker v. State

636 So. 2d 1347, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 299, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 841, 1994 WL 233902
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 636 So. 2d 1342 →
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 2, 1994·No. No. 81614·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review Baker v. State, 614 So.2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), based on conflict. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We recently resolved the issue presented in this ease in Metcalf v. State, 635 So.2d 11 (Fla.1994), where we found a due process violation when police used illegally manufactured drugs in a reverse-sting operation. On authority of Metcalf we quash the decision under review.

It is so ordered.

[1348]*1348GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. McDONALD, Senior Justice, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 636 So. 2d 1347, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 299, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 841, 1994 WL 233902 (Fla. 1994).

636 So. 2d 1347 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Metcalf v. State
635 So. 2d 11 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Baker v. State
614 So. 2d 559 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)