Baker v. State ex rel. Hager

Ohio Circuit Courts

Baker v. State ex rel. Hager

4 Ohio C.C. 30, 2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 401, 1889 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 34

DecidedMay 23, 1889

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Ohio C.C. 30 (Baker v. State ex rel. Hager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. State ex rel. Hager, 4 Ohio C.C. 30, 2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 401, 1889 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 34 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Section 2963 of the Revised Statutes, as amended March 21st, 1887 (84 O. L., 217), regulates the compensation of the judges and clerks of all elections contemplated in chapter 2, title 12)of the statutes, except as otherwise expressly provided. The election mentioned in the petition is not within the exception to that section of the statutes. The proper construction of the section requires that the relator be paid by the county.

Being satisfied that the judgment of the court below is right, the application for stay of execution is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Section 2963 of the Revised Statutes, as amended March 21st, 1887 (84 O. L., 217), regulates the compensation of the judges and clerks of all elections contemplated in chapter 2, title 12)of the statutes, except as otherwise expressly provided. The election mentioned in the petition is not within the exception to that section of the statutes. The proper construction of the section requires that the relator be paid by the county.

Being satisfied that the judgment of the court below is right, the application for stay of execution is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Ohio C.C. 30, 2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 401, 1889 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-state-ex-rel-hager-ohiocirct-1889.