Baker v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Baker v. State

121 So. 918, 23 Ala. App. 603

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ala. App. 215 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 9, 1929·No. 8 Div. 781.·Published

Opinion

BRIOKEN, P. J.

Appellant was tried by the court, without a jury, upon an affidavit or complaint which charged him with the offense of violating the prohibition law. Upon the *604 evidence adduced the court pronounced him guilty and rendered judgment accordingly.

The record proper, upon which this appeal is predicated solely, is free from irregularity or error. Let the judgment of conviction appealed from stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRIOKEN, P. J.

Appellant was tried by the court, without a jury, upon an affidavit or complaint which charged him with the offense of violating the prohibition law. Upon the *604 evidence adduced the court pronounced him guilty and rendered judgment accordingly.

The record proper, upon which this appeal is predicated solely, is free from irregularity or error. Let the judgment of conviction appealed from stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Baker v. State, 121 So. 918, 23 Ala. App. 603 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

121 So. 918 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.