Baker v. State

88 So. 184, 17 Ala. App. 669, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 20
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 18, 1921·No. 6 Div. 738.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

This appeal is upon the record proper without bill of exceptions. Tbe record appears to be free from error as far as the judgment of conviction is concerned. There was error, however, in sentencing the defendant to a fixed term of imprisonment in the penitentiary. Acts 1919, p. 148, provide that in eases of this character an indeterminate term of imprisonment must be imposed. See John Baker v. State, ante, p. 668, 88 South. 184. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Under authority of the Baker Case, supra, the cause must be reversed, for proper sentence in conformity to law.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 88 So. 184, 17 Ala. App. 669, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 20 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).

88 So. 184 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. State
88 So. 185 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1921)