Baker v. State
This text of 736 So. 2d 1133 (Baker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Ronald Baker, pled guilty to trafficking in cocaine, a violation of §
On appeal, counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in substantial compliance with Anders v. California,
However, our examination of the record reveals that the trial court did not impose a fine when it sentenced the appellant. Section
We remand so the trial court may impose a fine consistent with §
AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Long, P.J., and McMillan, Cobb, and Brown, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
736 So. 2d 1133, 1998 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 180, 1998 WL 544935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-state-alacrimapp-1998.