Baker v. SSA
This text of 2012 DNH 002 (Baker v. SSA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Baker v . SSA 10-CV-454-SM 1/3/12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Deborah Baker, Claimant
v. Civil N o . 10-cv-454-SM Opinion N o . 2012 DNH 002
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant
O R D E R
After due consideration of claimant’s objection, the court
approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate
Judge McCafferty dated November 1 5 , 2011 (document n o . 1 3 ) . See
generally 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
One point raised by claimant in her objection to the Report
and Recommendation warrants comment. Claimant asserts that the
ALJ never found that she can lift 20 pounds and, consequently,
the ALJ concluded without record support that she can perform
light work. The court disagrees. The ALJ determined that
claimant “has the residual functional capacity to perform light
work as defined in 20 C.F.R. 404.1567(b).” Administrative Record
(“Admin. Rec.”) at 11 (emphasis supplied). That finding
necessarily means he concluded that claimant can, as the
regulations provide, perform work involving “lifting no more than 20 pounds at a time with frequent lifting or carrying of objects
weighing up to 10 pounds.” 20 C.F.R. § 404.1567(b). The ALJ’s
subsequent statements about claimant’s ability to lift 10 pounds
are not inconsistent with that determination. And, as the
Magistrate Judge noted, the conclusion that claimant can
occasionally lift up to 20 pounds is amply supported by
substantial evidence in the record (including claimant’s own
hearing testimony about her ability to lift her grandson, who
weighs approximately 20 pounds). Admin. Rec. at 25-26.
Claimant’s motion for an order reversing the Commissioner’s
decision (document n o . 9 ) is denied. The Commissioner’s motion
for an order affirming his decision (document n o . 10) is granted.
The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this
order and close the case.
SO ORDERED.
Steven J./McAuliffe Jnited States District Judge
January 3 , 2012
cc: Francis M . Jackson, Esq. Karen B . Fitzmaurice, Esq. Gretchen L . Witt, Esq.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 DNH 002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-ssa-nhd-2012.