Baker v. Spine-Tech Surgical, Inc.
825 So. 2d 585, 2002 La.App. 3 Cir. 68, 2002 La. App. LEXIS 2673
Opinion
For the reasons set forth in the companion case hereto, James Baker, Et Ux v. Jeffery Allen Williams, P.A., 02-67 (La.App. 3 Cir. 8/28/02); 825 So.2d 563, the judgment of the trial court, dismissing Plaintiffs’ suit against Defendants, Spine-Tech Surgical, Inc., Spine-Tech, Inc. and Sulzer Spine-Tech, Inc., is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against Plaintiff-Appellant, James Baker.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baker v. Spine-Tech Surgical, Inc., 825 So. 2d 585, 2002 La.App. 3 Cir. 68, 2002 La. App. LEXIS 2673 (La. Ct. App. 2002).
825 So. 2d 585 (Baker v. Spine-Tech Surgical, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Malone v. Tubbs
825 So. 2d 585 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)