Baker v. Southern Railway Co.

395 S.E.2d 670, 195 Ga. App. 647, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 640
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1990
DocketA89A0508
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 395 S.E.2d 670 (Baker v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. Southern Railway Co., 395 S.E.2d 670, 195 Ga. App. 647, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 640 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

This case initially came before us as an appeal from a judgment granting appellee’s motion to dismiss an appeal for unreasonable and inexcusable delay in the filing of the transcript. In Baker v. Southern R. Co., 192 Ga. App. 444 (385 SE2d 125), we affirmed the judgment of the trial court, holding that the trial court’s findings were not erroneous, and that appellant had failed to establish that the trial court abused its discretion. In Baker v. Southern R. Co., 260 Ga. 115 (390 SE2d 576), the Supreme Court remanded our judgment with direction, holding that the trial court failed to make a specific finding that the failure to file timely the transcript was caused by appellant Baker and directing that the case be remanded for further action by the trial court in accordance with its opinion. See generally Wagner v. Howell, 257 Ga. 801 (363 SE2d 759) (setting forth the three criteria for dismissal of an appeal for failure timely to file a transcript).

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the trial court, and remand the case with direction that the trial court make those specific findings required by the Supreme Court, and thereafter enter those rulings, orders, or judgments deemed appropriate, in the exercise of its sound discretion, and not inconsistent with the holding of the majority of the Supreme Court, 260 Ga. 115, supra.

Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction.

Deen, P. J., and Cooper, J., concur. Neely & Player, Edgar A. Neely III, Tami L. Brown, William C. Thompson, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sellers v. Nodvin
411 S.E.2d 723 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
395 S.E.2d 670, 195 Ga. App. 647, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-southern-railway-co-gactapp-1990.