Baker v. Soltau
94 N.J. Eq. 544
This text of 94 N.J. Eq. 544 (Baker v. Soltau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baker v. Soltau, 94 N.J. Eq. 544 (N.J. 1923).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bentley.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trbnchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzbnbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—15.
For reversal—Pone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Weiss v. Rheinstein
142 A.2d 104 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
State v. Rosecliff Realty Co.
62 A.2d 488 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
94 N.J. Eq. 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-soltau-nj-1923.