Baker v. Soltau
94 N.J. Eq. 544
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bentley.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trbnchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzbnbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—15.
For reversal—Pone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baker v. Soltau, 94 N.J. Eq. 544 (N.J. 1923).
94 N.J. Eq. 544 (Baker v. Soltau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weiss v. Rheinstein
142 A.2d 104 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
State v. Rosecliff Realty Co.
62 A.2d 488 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)