Baker v. Smith

8 Tex. 346
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1852
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Tex. 346 (Baker v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. Smith, 8 Tex. 346 (Tex. 1852).

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

It may be true that the evidence is not sufficient to render the plaintiff liable in the character of partner on the contract of Van Horn, but it does sufficiently establish bis assent to that contract. The evidence of Van Horn shows that he was a party to the agreement that the lumber delivered should be received as a.payment on the plaintiff’s account. The answer states that the plaintiff gave his assent to tire contract, and that is sufficient to bind him, though the averment of a partnership had been stricken out. It was enough that lie was cognizant of and assented to the understanding pursuant to which the lumber was delivered.

We are of opinion that the verdict was fully warranted by the evidence, and that the judgment be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Tex. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-smith-tex-1852.