Baker v. Sherwood
This text of 254 P. 457 (Baker v. Sherwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, as assignee of a claimed lien for labor performed in raising crops on property owned by the respondents, having failed to take proper exceptions to the findings of the trial court, is limited in this appeal to an examination of those findings to determine whether they support the conclusions and judgment.
According to the findings, the appellant’s assignor waived by his conduct any claim that he may have had to a lien or claim for eloignment of the crop, and estoppel prevents his recovery in this action. Our examination of these findings leads us to the same conclusion as that reached by the trial court and the judgment refusing the appellant a recovery must therefore be sustained. Bell v. Swalwell Land, Loan & Trust Co., 20 Wash. 602, 56 Pac. 401; Rogers v. Reynolds, 95 Wash. 470, 164 Pac. 80.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 P. 457, 143 Wash. 691, 1927 Wash. LEXIS 1161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-sherwood-wash-1927.