Baker v. Scannell

California Supreme Court

Baker v. Scannell

1 Cal. Unrep. 72

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedApril 2, 1859

DocketNo. 1754

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 72 (Baker v. Scannell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Scannell, 1 Cal. Unrep. 72 (Cal. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

BALDWIN, J.

— The injunction in this ease should have been dissolved on the answers and affidavits. The main question is as to the fraud in the making of the note of Watson to Clement, and the allegations of the bill in this respect are fully denied. The denials, certainly, are quite as circumstantial and positive as the charges.

The order is reversed and the injunction dissolved, and cause remanded.

I concur: Field, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BALDWIN, J.

— The injunction in this ease should have been dissolved on the answers and affidavits. The main question is as to the fraud in the making of the note of Watson to Clement, and the allegations of the bill in this respect are fully denied. The denials, certainly, are quite as circumstantial and positive as the charges.

The order is reversed and the injunction dissolved, and cause remanded.

I concur: Field, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cal. Unrep. 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-scannell-cal-1859.