Baker v. Sanders

97 F. 948, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3353
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 16, 1899
DocketNo. 16
StatusPublished

This text of 97 F. 948 (Baker v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. Sanders, 97 F. 948, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3353 (circtedpa 1899).

Opinion

McPHERSON, District Judge.

If the defendant is merely the agent of William H. Baker, of Syracuse, N. Y., the complainant’s rights could be fully protected by asking Judge Coxe of the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of New York to enforce the decree entered on October 10th, but, as the true character of the relation between William H. Baker and the defendant may admit of doubt, since the defendant may be a partner, and not merely the agent, of Baker, and therefore may not be embraced within the terms of the decree, I think a similar order should be made in the case now before the court. It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defendant, James El wood Sanders, his servants, agents, employés, and clerks, be restrained from using the words “W. H. Baker” or “Wm. H. Baker is distinct from the old Chocolate Manufactory of Walter Baker & Company” in the business of making and selling chocolate and cocoa preparations, on labels, wrappers, boxes, cans, calces, molds, signs, letter and bill beads, advertisements, or in any other manner whatsoever ; and be further restrained and enjoined from using the name of “W. H. Baker” or “Wm. H. Baker” in connection with said business, on labels, wrappers, boxes, cans, cakes, molds, signs, letter and bill heads, advertisements, or in any other manner whatsoever.

But this injunction shall not operate to restrain and enjoin the defendant, his servants, agents, employés, and clerks, from using the name of “William H. Baker” in connection with said business on labels, etc.,- when the name is printed or written with the Christian name in full, and with the initials “W. H. B,” in larger type than the other letters, thus, “William H. Baker,” and in connection with the name “Syracuse,” which shall be printed or written in each instance substantially the same as the name ‘William H. [949]*949Baker,” with the letters of the entire name “Syracuse” as large as the said initials, or with the S as large as the initials of the name, and the balance of the letters in the word “Syracuse” in the same size as the smaller letters in the name “William H. Baker.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 F. 948, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-sanders-circtedpa-1899.