Baker v. RBS Worldpay, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Baker v. RBS Worldpay, Inc.

471 F. App'x 850

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 2012

DocketNo. 11-14835

StatusPublished

This text of 471 F. App'x 850 (Baker v. RBS Worldpay, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. RBS Worldpay, Inc., 471 F. App'x 850 (11th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellees RBS WorldPay, Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland, PLC, and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. and against plaintiff-appellants Chris Baker, Richard Batto, and Chris McMeekin. Appellants argue that the district court erred when it granted summary judgment against their claims for breach of contract, conversion, and unjust enrichment.

This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Levinson v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 245 F.3d 1321, 1325 (11th Cir.2001).

After reviewing the record and reading the parties’ briefs, we affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees based on the district court’s well-reasoned order filed on October 4, 2011.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellees RBS WorldPay, Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland, PLC, and Citizens Financial Group, Inc. and against plaintiff-appellants Chris Baker, Richard Batto, and Chris McMeekin. Appellants argue that the district court erred when it granted summary judgment against their claims for breach of contract, conversion, and unjust enrichment.

This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Levinson v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 245 F.3d 1321, 1325 (11th Cir.2001).

After reviewing the record and reading the parties’ briefs, we affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees based on the district court’s well-reasoned order filed on October 4, 2011.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

471 F. App'x 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-rbs-worldpay-inc-ca11-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack