Baker v. Plazmont Pharmacy, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baker v. Plazmont Pharmacy, Inc.

13 A.D.2d 626, 213 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11478

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 11, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 626 (Baker v. Plazmont Pharmacy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Plazmont Pharmacy, Inc., 13 A.D.2d 626, 213 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11478 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in favor of plaintiffs unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, the verdicts vacated, and a new trial granted, with costs to defendant-appellant, unless plaintiff Florence M. Baker stipulates to accept $15,000 in lieu of the award to her by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent, and is affirmed as thus modified, with costs to defendant-appellant. In this personal injury action, it is evident that the jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Florence M. Baker is excessive in its award of damages, and that a verdict in excess of $15,000 is not warranted by the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in favor of plaintiffs unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, the verdicts vacated, and a new trial granted, with costs to defendant-appellant, unless plaintiff Florence M. Baker stipulates to accept $15,000 in lieu of the award to her by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent, and is affirmed as thus modified, with costs to defendant-appellant. In this personal injury action, it is evident that the jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Florence M. Baker is excessive in its award of damages, and that a verdict in excess of $15,000 is not warranted by the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 626, 213 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-plazmont-pharmacy-inc-nyappdiv-1961.