Baker v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation

66 P. 806, 8 Idaho 36, 1901 Ida. LEXIS 47
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 23, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 66 P. 806 (Baker v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation, 66 P. 806, 8 Idaho 36, 1901 Ida. LEXIS 47 (Idaho 1901).

Opinion

Per CURIAM.

— The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal from the judgment and the appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial, on the ground that no appeal bond was given on either appeal as required by law. The record shows that only one undertaking upon appeal was given, and this undertaking recites both appeals, and then undertakes that the appellant will pay “all damages and costs which may be awarded against the appellant on the appeal”; and this undertaking is void for uncertainty, as heretofore held by this court in numerous decisions. Appellant, recognizing the sufficiency of the grounds for respondent’s motion to dismiss, requests that the appeal be dismissed without prejudice, and that appellant be given leave to withdraw his transcript upon appeal.

Wherefore it is ordered that the said appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed, without prejudice to appellant’s rights, and that appellant be permitted to withdraw his printed transcript. The appellant to pay all costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mikulich v. Carner
228 P.2d 257 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1951)
Magee v. Whitacre
96 P.2d 201 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1939)
Thum v. Bailey
86 P. 279 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 P. 806, 8 Idaho 36, 1901 Ida. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-oregon-railroad-navigation-idaho-1901.