Baker v. Office of Personnel Management

395 F. App'x 694
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 21, 2010·No. 2010-3136·Unpublished

Opinion

ON MOTION

ORDER

The court treats Shirley K. Baker’s motion for an extension of time as a motion for reconsideration of the court’s September 2, 2010 order dismissing her petition for review for failure to file a brief. Baker also moves for leave to proceed in form in forma pauperis.

The court notes that Baker is not required to pay the docketing fee.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion for reconsideration will be granted, the mandate will be recalled, *695 the dismissal order will be vacated, and the petition for review will be reinstated, if Baker files her informal brief (form enclosed) within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.

(2) Baker’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. The requirement that she pay the fee is waived.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. Office of Personnel Management, 395 F. App'x 694 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

395 F. App'x 694 (Baker v. Office of Personnel Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.