Baker v. Nussbaum

New York Court of Common Pleas

Baker v. Nussbaum

1 Hilt. 549

CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas

DecidedApril 15, 1858

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Hilt. 549 (Baker v. Nussbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Nussbaum, 1 Hilt. 549 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Beady, J.

— The order appealed from was properly made. The.defendant admitted, by his answer, that the sum directed to be paid by the order was due to the plaintiff. No other construction can properly be given to the answer. The 35th rule of the court, relied on by the defendant, has no application to such orders. They may be enforced as a judgment or provisional remedy. § 244.

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beady, J.

— The order appealed from was properly made. The.defendant admitted, by his answer, that the sum directed to be paid by the order was due to the plaintiff. No other construction can properly be given to the answer. The 35th rule of the court, relied on by the defendant, has no application to such orders. They may be enforced as a judgment or provisional remedy. § 244.

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Hilt. 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-nussbaum-nyctcompl-1858.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack