Baker v. Nussbaum
1 Hilt. 549
Opinion
— The order appealed from was properly made. The.defendant admitted, by his answer, that the sum directed to be paid by the order was due to the plaintiff. No other construction can properly be given to the answer. The 35th rule of the court, relied on by the defendant, has no application to such orders. They may be enforced as a judgment or provisional remedy. § 244.
Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baker v. Nussbaum, 1 Hilt. 549 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1858).
1 Hilt. 549 (Baker v. Nussbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thompson v. Seimer
40 How. Pr. 246 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1870)