Baker v. Nipper

198 S.W. 596, 1917 Tex. App. LEXIS 941
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 1, 1917
DocketNo. 1898.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 198 S.W. 596 (Baker v. Nipper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. Nipper, 198 S.W. 596, 1917 Tex. App. LEXIS 941 (Tex. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

WIBBSON, C. J.

[1,2] The transcript does does not contain the pleadings of the parties. It consists solely of (1) the order of the district judge refusing to grant appellant a temporary injunction, from which order the appeal is prosecuted; (2) the appeal bond; and (3) the clerk’s cost bill and certificate. As this court cannot determine from such a record whether the district judge erred when he refused to grant the relief sought, or not, it will dismiss the appeal, following the course pursued by the Supreme Court in Watson v. Watson, 69 Tex. 105, 5 S. W. 377, and Hubby v. Harris, 59 Tex. 14. Papers purporting to have been filed with the clerk of the court below and to be appellant’s petition for an injunction and appellee’s answer thereto, were, it seems, sent to this court with the transcript ; but they were not entitled to be filed here, and cannot be considered as a part of the record on the appeal. Vernon’s Statutes, art. 2109 et seq.; rules 85, 94, 100 for District and County Courts (142 S. W. xxiii, xxiv); rule 22 for Courts of Civil Appeals (142 S. W. xii); Maass v. Solinsky, 67 Tex. 290, 3 S. W. 289; Clayton v. Preston, 54 Tex. 418; Crawford v. Abbey, 79 S. W. 346; Watkins v. Hopkins County, 72 S. W. 872; Eastin v. Ferguson, 4 Tex. Civ. App. 643, 23 S. W. 918.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Downey v. Downey
117 S.W.2d 830 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Herzig v. Commercial State Bank
91 F.2d 646 (Tenth Circuit, 1937)
Joyce v. Armourdale State Bank
274 P. 200 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1929)
Linn County Bank v. Davis
175 P. 972 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 S.W. 596, 1917 Tex. App. LEXIS 941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-nipper-texapp-1917.