Baker v. Napolitano

358 F. App'x 162
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 2009
DocketNo. 2009-1533
StatusPublished

This text of 358 F. App'x 162 (Baker v. Napolitano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. Napolitano, 358 F. App'x 162 (Fed. Cir. 2009).

Opinion

ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

The parties respond to the court’s November 2, 2009 order directing a response as to whether this appeal should be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit or dismissed.

Timothy Peter Baker appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the District of Alabama, dismissing his complaint with prejudice. Baker’s complaint alleged wrongdoing stemming from a prior settlement agreement between Baker and the Department of Homeland Secretary. This court is a court of limited jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1295. Because this case does not fall within our jurisdiction, we transfer this appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion to transfer is granted. The appeal is transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
358 F. App'x 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-napolitano-cafc-2009.