Baker v. Murphrey

119 S.E.2d 398, 254 N.C. 506, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 484
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 19, 1961
StatusPublished

This text of 119 S.E.2d 398 (Baker v. Murphrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. Murphrey, 119 S.E.2d 398, 254 N.C. 506, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 484 (N.C. 1961).

Opinion

PER Cueiam.

In the light of the stipulated facts encompassed in the conclusions of law in respect to the acts of H. J. Brown, as Deputy Clerk, the principle is well settled in this State that there is a prima facie presumption that a deputy clerk, authorized by statute to take acknowledgments, is duly appointed and qualified, nothing else appearing. Piland v. Taylor, 113 N.C. 1, 18 S.E. 70. 1 Am. Jur. 333, Sec. 50 See also G.S. 52-12 and G.S. 47-1.

Applying this principle to the case in hand, the challenge to the conclusions of law are without merit. Hence the judgment from which appeal is taken is

Affirnjed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Piland v. . Taylor
18 S.E. 70 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 S.E.2d 398, 254 N.C. 506, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-murphrey-nc-1961.