Baker v. Moore

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Baker v. Moore

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 325

Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided August 12, 1726·Published

Opinion

On Motion this day being made by Mr. Hamilton Council for the plan-tiff to have the Bill of Complaint read as likewise the Answer and Demurer of the Defendant the Council for the plantiff pleads that the Defendant has been guilty of Usury; Mr. Whitaker and Mr. Allein Council for the Defendant Alledges that no Man is Obliged to answer to what will lay him open to any Penalty at Common Law, and denys that they have been guilty of any Usury, The Cause being Maturely Considered and Debated

It is the Opinion of this Court that the Defendants Demurrer is good and its therefore Allowed of and the Bill is dismissed.

Intr.

J. Skene Register

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Motion this day being made by Mr. Hamilton Council for the plan-tiff to have the Bill of Complaint read as likewise the Answer and Demurer of the Defendant the Council for the plantiff pleads that the Defendant has been guilty of Usury; Mr. Whitaker and Mr. Allein Council for the Defendant Alledges that no Man is Obliged to answer to what will lay him open to any Penalty at Common Law, and denys that they have been guilty of any Usury, The Cause being Maturely Considered and Debated

It is the Opinion of this Court that the Defendants Demurrer is good and its therefore Allowed of and the Bill is dismissed.

Intr.

J. Skene Register

Baker v. Moore, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 325 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1726).

Pincite

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 325 (Baker v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.