Baker v. Mix

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Baker v. Mix

2 F. Cas. 471, 3 Cranch 1, 3 D.C. 1

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedDecember 15, 1826

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 F. Cas. 471 (Baker v. Mix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Mix, 2 F. Cas. 471, 3 Cranch 1, 3 D.C. 1 (circtddc 1826).

Pincite

Opinion

But the COURT,

(CRANCH, Chief Judge, contra,)

rejected the evidence on the issue of nulla bona.

Mr. Marbury moved for a new trial on the ground that the court erred In rejecting the evidence, and the motion came on to be argued at December term, 1826.

Mr. Marbury for the garnishee. Infancy may be given in evidence upon the general issue; so may coverture; yet in one case the plaintiff may reply, necessaries; and, in the other, special matter avoiding the marriage; so a parol release, or payment, and most matters in discharge of the action. 1 Chit. Pl. 471; Miller v. Aris, 3 Esp. 234; Sullivan v. Montague, 1 Doug. 106: Serg. Attachm. 93; Wood v. Roach, 2 Dall. [2 U. S.] 180; Steuart v. West, 1 Har. & J. 536; Harding v. Hull, 5 Har. & J. 478; U. S. v. Vaughan, 3 Bin. 400.

Mr. Reddin, contra. The plea of nulla bona goes only to the existence of the debt; an assignment does not show the debt is not due, and therefore should be pleaded specially. It admits the debt to be due at law, and is only a kind of equitable defence which the plaintiff, who had no notice of the assignment, did not come prepared to answer upon the issue of nulla bona. 1 Chit. PI. 40S. In the case from 3 Bin. 400, there was no question as to the form of the plea. In the case from 1 Har. & J. 536, the note [472]*472was negotiable so that there was no debt to the defendant after his indorsement; and in the case from 5 Har. & J. 478, the assignment transferred the legal title, as well as the equitable. The plaintiff claims equal equity with that of the assignee, and has a legal remedy against a legal debtor of his debtor. A lien must be pleaded. Clarke v. Hougham, 9 Serg. & Lowb. 42, [9 E. C. L. 73;] 2 Esp. N. P. 536.

Mr. Marbury, in reply. In Pennsylvania a common promissory note, payable to order, is not negotiable. U. S. v. Vaughan, 3 Bin. 394. An assignment need not be a transfer of the legal right of action to enable the garnishee to plead nulla bona.

The COURT (CRANCH, Chief Judge, contra,) refused to grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

But the COURT,

(CRANCH, Chief Judge, contra,)

rejected the evidence on the issue of nulla bona.

Mr. Marbury moved for a new trial on the ground that the court erred In rejecting the evidence, and the motion came on to be argued at December term, 1826.

Mr. Marbury for the garnishee. Infancy may be given in evidence upon the general issue; so may coverture; yet in one case the plaintiff may reply, necessaries; and, in the other, special matter avoiding the marriage; so a parol release, or payment, and most matters in discharge of the action. 1 Chit. Pl. 471; Miller v. Aris, 3 Esp. 234; Sullivan v. Montague, 1 Doug. 106: Serg. Attachm. 93; Wood v. Roach, 2 Dall. [2 U. S.] 180; Steuart v. West, 1 Har. & J. 536; Harding v. Hull, 5 Har. & J. 478; U. S. v. Vaughan, 3 Bin. 400.

Mr. Reddin, contra. The plea of nulla bona goes only to the existence of the debt; an assignment does not show the debt is not due, and therefore should be pleaded specially. It admits the debt to be due at law, and is only a kind of equitable defence which the plaintiff, who had no notice of the assignment, did not come prepared to answer upon the issue of nulla bona. 1 Chit. PI. 40S. In the case from 3 Bin. 400, there was no question as to the form of the plea. In the case from 1 Har. & J. 536, the note [472]*472was negotiable so that there was no debt to the defendant after his indorsement; and in the case from 5 Har. & J. 478, the assignment transferred the legal title, as well as the equitable. The plaintiff claims equal equity with that of the assignee, and has a legal remedy against a legal debtor of his debtor. A lien must be pleaded. Clarke v. Hougham, 9 Serg. & Lowb. 42, [9 E. C. L. 73;] 2 Esp. N. P. 536.

Mr. Marbury, in reply. In Pennsylvania a common promissory note, payable to order, is not negotiable. U. S. v. Vaughan, 3 Bin. 394. An assignment need not be a transfer of the legal right of action to enable the garnishee to plead nulla bona.

The COURT (CRANCH, Chief Judge, contra,) refused to grant a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 F. Cas. 471, 3 Cranch 1, 3 D.C. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-mix-circtddc-1826.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack