Baker v. Mission Chateau, L.L.C.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
CONSOLIDATED CASES
STEPHANIE WILBUR,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 21-2120-EFM
MISSION CHATEAU, L.L.C., et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________
MONICA PORTER,
v. Case No. 21-2121-EFM
____________________________________________________________________
RONALD BAKER,
v. Case No. 21-2145-EFM
O:\ORDERS\21-2120-EFM,21-2121-EFM,21-2145-EFM-consolidation.docx ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION
On August 2, 2021, the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge, James P. O’Hara, conducted a scheduling conference in the above-captioned cases. The parties agreed at the conference that the three cases are factually and legally related and, therefore, should be consolidated for discovery and pretrial purposes. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), a court may consolidate or join for trial or hearing “any or all the matters at issue in the actions” if the actions involve a “common question of law
or fact.” The decision whether to consolidate such actions is left to the sound discretion of the trial court.1 In exercising its discretion, the court should take into consideration whether judicial efficiency is best served by consolidation.2 The above-captioned cases clearly involve common questions of law and fact. Each
alleges defendants engaged in racial discrimination in employment. The four defendants are the same in all cases. Counsel for each side is the same in all cases. Judicial efficiency would be best served by consolidation of these cases for all discovery and pretrial purposes. In consideration of the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: the above-captioned cases shall be consolidated for
discovery and pretrial purposes, all having been previously dual-assigned to U.S. District
1 Ryan Transp. Servs., Inc. v. Fleet Logistics, L.L.C., No. Civ. A. 04-2445-CM, 2005 WL 2293598, at *3 (D. Kan. Sept. 19, 2005) (citing Shump v. Balka, 574 F.2d 1341, 1344 (10th Cir. 1978)). 2 C.T. v. Liberal Sch. Dist., 562 F. Supp. 2d 1324, 1346 (D. Kan. 2008). 2
O:\ORDERS\21-2120-EFM,21-2121-EFM,21-2145-EFM-consolidation.docx Judge Eric F. Melgren and the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge. Case No. 21-2120- EFM shall be designated as the lead case. All future pleadings, except for those related to dispositive motions, shall bear the consolidated caption on this order and shall be filed in
only the lead case. Any dispositive motions and other filings related to the same shall be filed in the specific case without a consolidated caption. Dated August 2, 2021, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ James P. O=Hara James P. O=Hara U.S. Magistrate Judge
O:\ORDERS\21-2120-EFM,21-2121-EFM,21-2145-EFM-consolidation.docx
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baker v. Mission Chateau, L.L.C. (Baker v. Mission Chateau, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.