Baker v. Maytag

Supreme Court of Florida

Baker v. Maytag

181 So. 2d 346

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 24, 1965

DocketNo. 34281

StatusPublished

This text of 181 So. 2d 346 (Baker v. Maytag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Maytag, 181 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this court, and the writ was issued. Argument has been heard and upon further consideration and review of the briefs and cited cases, we are unable to find sufficient conflict with the decisions of this court or of the other District Courts of Appeal to vest jurisdiction in this court as required by the Constitution, Article V, Section 4, F.S.A.

Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., and JOHNSON, District Court Judge, concur. THORNAL, C. J., agrees to judgment dismissing petition. DREW, J., heard argument but did not participate in the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this court, and the writ was issued. Argument has been heard and upon further consideration and review of the briefs and cited cases, we are unable to find sufficient conflict with the decisions of this court or of the other District Courts of Appeal to vest jurisdiction in this court as required by the Constitution, Article V, Section 4, F.S.A.

Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., and JOHNSON, District Court Judge, concur. THORNAL, C. J., agrees to judgment dismissing petition. DREW, J., heard argument but did not participate in the decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 So. 2d 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-maytag-fla-1965.