Baker v. Massey Harris Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Baker v. Massey Harris Co.

49 S.W.2d 1060, 227 Mo. App. 30, 1932 Mo. App. LEXIS 104

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 23, 1932

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 S.W.2d 1060 (Baker v. Massey Harris Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Massey Harris Co., 49 S.W.2d 1060, 227 Mo. App. 30, 1932 Mo. App. LEXIS 104 (Mo. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinions

The Workmen's Compensation Commission on January 16, 1930, made an award in favor of Estella Joyner Baker, defendant in error, and against Massey Harris Company and Zurich General Accident Liability Insurance Company, plaintiffs in error. The plaintiffs in error appealed from the award to the circuit court of Jackson county. Upon hearing of the appeal the award of the commission was, on September 10, 1930, affirmed. Plaintiffs in error now seek to have reviewed upon writ of error, the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award of the commission.

In the view we take of the case, further statement is unnecessary. *Page 31

It has been determined that a judgment based upon the Workmen's Compensation Act cannot be reviewed upon writ of error. [Wheat v. Globe Indemnity Company, 44 S.W.2d 168; Kristanik v. Motor Company, 41 S.W.2d 911; Daniels v. Box Company, 46 S.W.2d 1108.]

It follows that we are without jurisdiction to review the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award of the commission. The writ of error is dismissed. The commissioner so recommends. Boyer, C., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Workmen's Compensation Commission on January 16, 1930, made an award in favor of Estella Joyner Baker, defendant in error, and against Massey Harris Company and Zurich General Accident Liability Insurance Company, plaintiffs in error. The plaintiffs in error appealed from the award to the circuit court of Jackson county. Upon hearing of the appeal the award of the commission was, on September 10, 1930, affirmed. Plaintiffs in error now seek to have reviewed upon writ of error, the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award of the commission.

In the view we take of the case, further statement is unnecessary. *Page 31

It has been determined that a judgment based upon the Workmen's Compensation Act cannot be reviewed upon writ of error. [Wheat v. Globe Indemnity Company, 44 S.W.2d 168; Kristanik v. Motor Company, 41 S.W.2d 911; Daniels v. Box Company, 46 S.W.2d 1108.]

It follows that we are without jurisdiction to review the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award of the commission. The writ of error is dismissed. The commissioner so recommends. Boyer, C., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 S.W.2d 1060, 227 Mo. App. 30, 1932 Mo. App. LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-massey-harris-co-moctapp-1932.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack